Heeter v. J. Peterman Enterprises, LLC et al, No. 2:2015cv03062 - Document 58 (S.D. Ohio 2017)

Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER granting 50 Plaintiff Alan Mayle's Motion for Default Judgment and granting in part and denying in part 42 Plaintiff Brian Heeter's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Plaintiff Heeter's Motion is granted in par t as to Defendants Robert Shotwell and J. Peterman Enterprises LLC, but denied in part as to Defendants Michael Shotwell and Carlton Banks Enterprises, LLC. The Court will consider evidence of the amount of damages, lost profits, attorneys' fee s, and the nature and extent of injunctive relief requested by both Plaintiffs at a combined hearing to be scheduled forthwith by separate order. Signed by Chief Judge Edmund A. Sargus on 09/21/2017. (dh1)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

Download PDF
Heeter v. J. Peterman Enterprises, LLC et al Doc. 58 Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.