Thomas v. Columbus City of et al, No. 2:2015cv02469 - Document 80 (S.D. Ohio 2017)

Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 48 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment and granting in part and denying in part 56 Plaintiff's Motion in Limine to Exclude Inadmissible Evidence. Morrow and the City of Colum bus are entitled to summary judgment on each of the claims brought against them. Rogers is entitled to summary judgment on the illegal search claim. Laughlin and Rogers are entitled to summary judgment on the portion of the illegal arrest claim con cerning Thomas's time in custody following his identification by HB. Laughlin and Rogers are entitled to summary judgment on the illegal search portion of the civil conspiracy claim. Signed by Chief Judge Edmund A. Sargus on 09/20/2017. (dh1)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
Download PDF
Thomas v. Columbus City of et al Doc. 80 Dockets.Justia.com