Pullen v. Howard et al, No. 2:2014cv00104 - Document 106 (S.D. Ohio 2017)

Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER adopting 100 the Magistrate Judge's 09/13/16 Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is granted in part and denied in part. Genuine issues of fact preclude summary judgment with regard to Plaintiff's excessive force claim against Escorting Officers Gleason, Harris and Newsome that is premised upon his allegations in Paragraph 30 of his Amended Complaint 11 . Summary Judgment is granted in favor of Defendants on all of Plaintiff's remaining claims. Signed by Chief Judge Edmund A. Sargus on 01/03/2017. (dh1)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

Download PDF
Pullen v. Howard et al Doc. 106 Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.