Childers v. Warden Chillicothe Correctional Institution, No. 2:2013cv00991 - Document 14 (S.D. Ohio 2014)

Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER overruling 13 the Petitioner's Objection to 11 the Magistrate Judge's 06/26/14 Report and Recommendation and adopting and affirming the Report and Recommendation. Petitioner's request for a stay is denied. Petit ioner's request to delete this claim and proceed on his remaining exhausted claims is granted. Respondent's Motion to Dismiss 9 is accordingly denied as moot to the extent that Petitioner's unexhausted claim of ineffective assistanc e of appellate counsel is now deleted from the Petition. Respondent is directed to file an answer to the Petition that complies with Rule 5 of the Rules Governing Section § 2254 Cases in the U.S. District Courts within 21 days. Petitioner may file a response within 21 days thereafter. Signed by Judge Edmund A Sargus on 08/04/2014. (dh1)

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.