Wilson v. Commissioner of Social Security, No. 2:2013cv00832 - Document 29 (S.D. Ohio 2014)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 28 Report and Recommendations and awards attorney's fees to Plaintiff. Signed by Senior Judge Peter C. Economus on 10/30/2014. (ds)

Download PDF
Wilson v. Commissioner of Social Security Doc. 29 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION TERESA WILSON, Plaintiff, Case No. 2:13-cv-832 Judge Peter C. Economus v. COMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Magistrate Judge King MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Defendant. This matter is before the Court for consideration of the Report and Recommendation (“R & R”) of the Magistrate Judge. (ECF No. 28.) The Magistrate Judge recommended that the Court grant Plaintiff’s motion for attorney’s fees pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412. No party has objected to the R & R and the time period for filing objections has past. The R & R of the Magistrate Judge specifically advised the parties that failure to object to the R & R within fourteen days results in a “waiver of the right to de novo review by the District Judge and waiver of the right to appeal the judgment of the District Court.” (ECF No. 28 at 7.) The Court has reviewed the R & R of the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). Noting that no objections have been filed and that the time for filing such objections has expired, the Court ADOPTS the R & R of the Magistrate Judge and awards attorney’s fees to Plaintiff. The Clerk is DIRECTED to remove this action from the Court’s pending case list. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.