Langenfeld v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc., No. 2:2013cv00469 - Document 48 (S.D. Ohio 2014)
Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 47 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re 41 MOTION for Summary Judgment - Responses due by 5/19/2014. Signed by Judge Gregory L Frost on 5/5/2014. (kk2)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION KAREN LANGENFELD, Plaintiff, Case No. 2:13-cv-469 JUDGE GREGORY L. FROST Magistrate Judge Mark R. Abel v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., Defendant. OPINION AND ORDER This matter is before the Court for consideration of Plaintiff s motion for a fourteen-day extension of time in which to respond to Defendant s motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 47.) For good cause shown, the Court GRANTS the request for an extension, but DENIES Plaintiff s request to extend the deadline until May 27, 2014. Plaintiff s response in opposition to Defendant s pending motion for summary judgment shall be filed on or before May 19, 2014. The non-oral hearing on Defendant s pending motion remains scheduled for June 13, 2014. IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/ Gregory L. Frost GREGORY L. FROST UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
