Johnson v. Muskingum Co. Sheriff's Dept. et al, No. 2:2013cv00025 - Document 87 (S.D. Ohio 2014)
Court Description: OPINION and ORDER adopting 76 the Report and Recommendation. Signed by Judge Michael H. Watson on 9/17/14. (jk1)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION Jeffery A. Johnson, Plaintiff, Case No. 2:13-cv-25 v. Judge Michael H. Watson Muskingum Co. Sheriff's Dept., eta/., Defendants. OPINION AND ORDER On May 5, 2014, United States Magistrate Judge King issued a Report and Recommendation ("R&R") recommending the Court grant Defendants Anthony Khoury's and Shane Love's motion for summary judgment, ECF No. 66. ECF No. 76. The R&R notified the parties of their right to file objections to the R&R pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 636(b)(1 )(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). /d. at 14. The R&R further specifically advised the parties that the failure to object to the R&R within fourteen days would result in a waiver of both the right to de novo review by the District Judge and the right to appeal the decision of the District Court adopting the R&R. /d. The deadline for filing such objections has passed, and no objections were filed. See Opinion and Order on Motion to Strike, ECF No. 84 (finding Plaintiff's June 3, 2014 objections untimely as to the instant R&R). Having received no timely objections, the Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED. The Clerk shall remove ECF No. 66 from the Civil Justice Reform Act Motions Report. IT IS SO ORDERED. ~-Ul~ MICHAELH:WAl"SON, JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
