In Re: Ohio Execution Protocol Litigation, No. 2:2011cv01016 - Document 828 (S.D. Ohio 2016)
Court Description: DECISION AND ORDER ON ALABAMA SUBPOENAS - Plaintiff's Motion for an Order that Fourteen Calendar Days is a Reasonable Time within which to Comply with Rule 45 Subpoena (ECF No. 821) is GRANTED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz on 12/16/2016. (kpf)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
In Re: Ohio Execution Protocol Litigation Doc. 828 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION AT COLUMBUS In re: OHIO EXECUTION PROTOCOL LITIGATION, : Case No. 2:11-cv-1016 Chief Judge Edmund A. Sargus, Jr. Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz This Order relates to Plaintiffs Phillips, Tibbetts, and Otte DECISION AND ORDER ON ALABAMA SUBPOENAS This capital § 1983 case is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion for an Order that Fourteen Calendar Days is a Reasonable Time within which to Comply with Rule 45 Subpoena (ECF No. 821). Defendants have no objections (ECF No. 826) and the Motion is therefore GRANTED. This is necessarily without barring any objections which may be made by the person or entity subpoenaed. In examining the form of subpoenas attached to the Motion, the Court notes that they do not comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 45(a)(1)(A)(iv). Use of the subpoenas in their present form risks a motion to quash on that basis. December 16, 2016. s/ Michael R. Merz United States Magistrate Judge 1 Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
