Peirano v. Momentive Specialty Chemicals, Inc., No. 2:2011cv00281 - Document 49 (S.D. Ohio 2012)

Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 22 Momentive's Motion for Summary Judgment. The motion is granted with regard to Peirano's wage and hour claims, but denied with regard to Peirano's claims for disability discrimination, failure to accommodate, and retaliation. Momentive's Motions to Strike 30 , 35 are denied subject to the qualifications outlined in this Opinion and Order. Signed by Judge Edmund A Sargus on 10/17/2012. (dh1)

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.