Wells et al v. Rhodes et al, No. 2:2011cv00217 - Document 111 (S.D. Ohio 2013)

Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER granting 96 Plaintiffs Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on the Issue of Liability. Plaintiffs are specifically entitled to judgment against Defendant Rhodes, as to the issue of liability, on their 42 U.S.C. § 1982, 42 U.S.C. § 1985, and 42 U.S.C. § 3617 claims. Defendant Rhodes' Motion for Summary Judgment 94 is denied. Signed by Judge Edmund A Sargus on 02/12/2013. (dh1)

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.