Conley v. The United States et al, No. 2:2010cv00444 - Document 79 (S.D. Ohio 2012)
Court Description: NUNC PRO TUNC Order: On 01/20/2012, the Court issued an Opinion and Order 74 that contained a scrivener's error. The reference to ".07%" in footnote one on page six should have read ".03%.". Signed by Judge Edmund A Sargus on 08/20/2012. (dh1)
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
