Fithen et al v. City Of Gahanna, Ohio et al, No. 2:2009cv00777 - Document 19 (S.D. Ohio 2009)
Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER granting 5 & 10 Plaintiffs' Motion to Amend the complaint to assert a claim against a new party defendant. Plaintiff shall promptly effect service of process on the newly-joined defendant. Signed by Magistrate Judge Norah McCann King on 10/26/2009. (er1)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION RONALD FITHEN, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Civil Action 2:09-CV-777 Judge Watson Magistrate Judge King CITY OF GAHANNA, OHIO, et al., Defendants. OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff Ronald Fithen asserts various claims under federal and state law, including the FMLA, 29 U.S.C. ยง2601 et seq. This matter is now before the Court on plaintiffs motion for leave to amend the complaint to join as an additional defendant Kristin Treadway, identified as the human resources director for the Gahanna Police Department. Doc. Nos. 5, 10. Plaintiffs motion is governed by Rule 15(a) of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, which provides that [t]he court should freely give leave [to amend] when justice so requires. F.R. Civ. P. 15(a)(2). The grant or denial of a request to amend a complaint is left to the broad discretion of the trial court. F.2d 1119, 1130 (6th Cir. 1990). General Elec. Co. v. Sargent & Lundy, 915 In exercising its discretion, the trial court may consider such factors as undue delay, bad faith or dilatory motive on the part of a movant, repeated failures to cure deficiencies by amendments previously allowed, undue prejudice to the opposing party by virtue of allowance of the amendment [and] futility of the amendment. Foman v. Davis, 371 U.S. 178, 182 (1962). In objecting to the proposed amendment, defendants argue that the proposed amended complaint fails to assert a claim against Kristin Treadway. In reply, however, plaintiffs point out that, as the Director of Human Resources for the defendant city, the proposed new party defendant may be subject to individual liability on plaintiff s claim under the FMLA. See Mitchell v. Chapman, 343 F.3d 811, 827 (6th Cir. 2003)(recognizing the great weight of authority that the FMLA imposes individual liability on private-sector employers). Under these circumstances, plaintiffs motion to amend the complaint to assert a claim against a new party defendant, Doc. No. 5, 10, is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall promptly effect service of process on the newly-joined defendant. October 26, 2009 s/Norah McCann King Norah McCann King United States Magistrate Judge 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
