Hand v. Houk, No. 2:2007cv00846 - Document 104 (S.D. Ohio 2011)
Court Description: DECISION AND ORDER CONDITIONALLY DENYING MOTION TO DISCHARGE COUNSEL - Gerald Hand has moved this Court pro se to dismiss his appointed counsel (Doc. No. 103). This Motion is denied without prejudice to its renewal on the conditions set forth in this Decision and Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 5/31/2011. (kpf1)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON GERALD HAND, : Petitioner, Case No. 2:07-cv-846 : Judge Sandra S. Beckwith Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz -vsMARC HOUK, Warden, : Respondent. DECISION AND ORDER CONDITIONALLY DENYING MOTION TO DISCHARGE COUNSEL Petitioner Gerald Hand has moved this Court pro se to dismiss his appointed counsel (Doc. No. 103). Petitioner is under a death sentence and was appointed counsel under 18 U.S.C. § 3599. He now seeks to discharge those attorneys (Ralph Kohnen, Jennifer Kinsley, and Jeanne Marie Cors) because he does not trust them any more to do the work that is needed to get me a new trial . . . Id. PageID 2419. Petitioner of course has the right to discharge counsel. However, he does not have the right to have these attorneys replaced with other counsel either of his choosing or chosen by the Court. Counsel appointed in this case are very experienced criminal attorneys. In observing their filings in the case and their performance at the evidentiary hearing, the Court has no basis to conclude that they have not performed in accordance with their professional obligations. Therefore if Petitioner chooses to discharge them, the Court will not appoint substitute counsel; Petitioner will have the -1- option of retaining counsel or proceeding pro se. There is no constitutional right to appointed counsel in a habeas corpus case; the right to such counsel in a death penalty case is created by statute, 18 U.S.C. § 3599. The statute does not allow petitioners to discharge appointed counsel at will and then obtain replacement counsel. Therefore, the Motion to Dismiss Counsel is denied without prejudice to its renewal on the conditions set forth in this Decision and Order. May 31, 2011. s/ Michael R. Merz United States Magistrate Judge -2-
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
