Gorecki v. City of Cambridge et al, No. 2:2007cv00420 - Document 98 (S.D. Ohio 2009)

Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER denying as moot 75 Defendants' Motion in Limine as to Claimed Damages; finding as moot 76 Defendants' Motion in Limine as to Citizen Complaints of Excessive Force; granting 83 Plaintiff's Motion in Limine Regard ing Misdemeanor Charges or Conviction; denying 84 Plaintiff's Motion to Take Judicial Notice of 18 USC 926C; denying as moot 85 Plaintiff's Motion in Limine to Preclude Any Reference to Charges in the Court of Common Pleas; granting [86 ] Plaintiff's Alternate Motion in Limine to Preclude Any Reference that Plaintiff Pleaded to Charge of Aggravated Menacing; and denying 97 Motion for Reconsideration of the Court's Order on Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Edmund A Sargus on 10/08/09. (dah)

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.