Monroe v. Warden Ohio State Penitentiary, No. 2:2007cv00258 - Document 57 (S.D. Ohio 2011)

Court Description: ORDER - Judge Watson has this date filed a final Opinion and Order on Petitioner's Motion for Reconsideration (Doc. No. 56). Therefore, in accordance with the Opinion and Order on scheduling entered by Judge Kemp on October 9, 2009, it is hereby ORDERED: 1. Respondent shall file an answer/return of writ complying with Rule 5 of the Rules Governing § 2254 Cases not later than May 27, 2011. 2. Petitioner shall file a reply/traverse not later than sixty days after the answer is filed. 3. Any party may file a motion for discovery not later than thirty days after the reply is filed. 4. Any party may file a motion for evidentiary hearing not later than thirty days after discovery is denied or after the discovery cut-off, whichever is later. No party may file a motion for summary judgment herein without prior permission of the Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 3/28/2011. (kpf1)

Download PDF
Monroe v. Warden Ohio State Penitentiary Doc. 57 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON JONATHON D. MONROE, : Petitioner, Case No. 2:07-cv-258 : District Judge Michael H. Watson Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz -vsWARDEN, Ohio State Penitentiary, : Respondent. ORDER Judge Watson has this date filed a final Opinion and Order on Petitioner’s Motion for Reconsideration (Doc. No. 56). Therefore, in accordance with the Opinion and Order on scheduling entered by Judge Kemp on October 9, 2009, it is hereby ORDERED: 1. Respondent shall file an answer/return of writ complying with Rule 5 of the Rules Governing § 2254 Cases not later than May 27, 2011. 2. Petitioner shall file a reply/traverse not later than sixty days after the answer is filed. 3. Any party may file a motion for discovery not later than thirty days after the reply is filed. 4. Any party may file a motion for evidentiary hearing not later than thirty days after discovery is denied or after the discovery cut-off, whichever is later. No party may file a motion for summary judgment herein without prior permission of the Court. March 28, 2011. s/ Michael R. Merz United States Magistrate Judge -1- Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.