Griffin v. Bradley et al, No. 1:2022cv00103 - Document 4 (S.D. Ohio 2022)

Court Description: DECISION AND ENTRY adopting the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (Doc. 2 ). Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 4/5/2022. (rrs)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

Download PDF
Griffin v. Bradley et al Doc. 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION MARK GRIFFIN, Plaintiff, vs. CHARLES BRADLEY, et al., Defendants. : : : : : : : : : : Case No. 1:22-cv-103 Judge Timothy S. Black Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Doc. 2) This case is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference to United States Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura. Pursuant to such reference, the Magistrate Judge reviewed the pleadings filed with this Court and, on February 28, 2022, submitted a Report and Recommendation. (Doc. 2). No objections were filed. As required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Court has reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge and considered de novo all of the filings in this matter. Upon consideration of the foregoing, the Court finds that the Report and Recommendation should be and is hereby adopted in its entirety. Accordingly, for the reasons stated above: 1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 2) is ADOPTED; 2. Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED to pay the full $402 filing fee ($350 filing fee, plus $52 administrative fee) required to commence this action WITHIN 30 DAYS. Plaintiff’s failure to timely pay the full $402 fee within thirty days will result in the dismissal of this action. Dockets.Justia.com 3. Plaintiff is ORDERED to file a Notice in all pending federal cases in which he was granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis status that identifies all of his previously-dismissed cases. 4. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a), the Court certifies that an appeal of this Order would not be taken in good faith and, therefore, the Court DENIES Plaintiff leave to appeal in forma pauperis. 5. Plaintiff is HEREBY ADVISED that the Court will dismiss with prejudice any future cases in which Plaintiff seeks in forma pauperis status without identifying previously-dismissed cases in accordance with Sloan v. Lesza, 181 F.3d 857 (7th Cir. 1999); see also Clervrain v. Lawson, No. 1:20-cr1306, ECF No. 5 (S.D. Ind. May 6, 2020) (denying Clervrain’s in forma pauperis motion and dismissing the action with prejudice because Clervrain failed to disclose that he was a three-striker). IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: s/Timothy S. Black Timothy S. Black United States District Judge 4/5/2022 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.