Glenn v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution, No. 1:2018cv00496 - Document 10 (S.D. Ohio 2020)
Court Description: DECISION AND ENTRY adopting Report and Recommendations re 7 Report and Recommendations. Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 10/16/2020. (rrs)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Glenn v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution Doc. 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION JASON GLEN, Petitioner, vs. WARDEN, CHILLICOTHE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, Respondent. : : : : : : : : : : Case No. 1:18-cv-496 Judge Timothy S. Black Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Doc. 7) AND TERMINATING THIS CASE IN THIS COURT This case is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference to United States Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman. Pursuant to such reference, the Magistrate Judge reviewed the pleadings filed with this Court and, on May 11, 2020, submitted a Report and Recommendation, recommending that Petitioner’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 be denied with prejudice. (Doc. 7). On May 26, 2020, Petitioner moved the Court for a 30-day extension of time to file objections to the Report and Recommendation. (Doc. 8). On May 27, 2020 the Court granted Petitioner’s motion and extended the deadline by which Petitioner was required to file objections to June 25, 2020. (Not. Order, May 27, 2020). On June 25, 2020, Petitioner moved the Court for another 30-day extension of time to file objections to the Report and Recommendation. (Doc. 9). On June 26, 2020, Dockets.Justia.com the Court granted Petitioner’s motion and extended the deadline by which Petitioner was required to file objections to July 27, 2020. (Not. Order, June 26, 2020). Now, the July 27, 2020 deadline has come and gone. And Petitioner has not filed any objections. As such, the Report and Recommendation stands unopposed. As required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Court has reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge and considered de novo all of the filings in this matter. Upon consideration of the foregoing, the Court finds that the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 7) should be and is hereby adopted in its entirety. Accordingly, for the reasons stated above: 1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 7) is ADOPTED in its entirety; 2. Petitioner’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Doc. 1) is DENIED with prejudice; 3. Because reasonable jurists would not debate the Court’s conclusions, the Court DENIES issuance of a certificate of appealability, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253; see Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000) (citing Barefoot v. Estelle, 463 U.S. 880, 893 & n.4 (1983)); 4. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), the Court certifies that an appeal of this Order would not be taken in good faith and, therefore, this Court DENIES Petitioner leave to appeal in forma pauperis; and 5. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly, whereupon this case is TERMINATED on the docket of this Court. IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: 10/16/2020 s/Timothy S. Black Timothy S. Black United States District Judge 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
