Burress-El v. Shabazz et al, No. 1:2017cv00866 - Document 10 (S.D. Ohio 2018)

Court Description: DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Doc. 4 ) AND TERMINATING THIS CASE IN THIS COURT. Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 11/21/18. (eh)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

Download PDF
Burress-El v. Shabazz et al Doc. 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION ANTUAN BURESS-EL, R, Plaintiff, vs. AYESHA SHABAZZ, et al., Defendants. : : : : : : : Case No. 1:17-cv-866 Judge Timothy S. Black Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Doc. 4) AND TERMINATING THIS CASE IN THIS COURT This case is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference to United States Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz. Pursuant to such reference, the Magistrate Judge reviewed the pleadings and submitted a Report and Recommendation recommending that the Complaint be dismissed with prejudice. (Doc. 4). Plaintiff timely filed an objection (“Objection”). (Doc. 5).1 As required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Court has reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge and considered de novo all of the filings in this matter. Upon consideration of the foregoing, the Court does determine that such Report and Recommendation should be and is hereby adopted in its entirety. Plaintiff’s Objection does not set forth any argument or authority to rebut the Magistrate Judge’s correct conclusion that the Complaint’s allegations are insufficient to state a claim with an arguable basis in law over which this Court has subject matter jurisdiction. The Objection (Doc. 5) is accordingly OVERRULED. 1 Dockets.Justia.com Accordingly: 1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 4) is ADOPTED; 2. Plaintiff’s Objection (Doc. 5) is OVERRULED; 3. Plaintiff’s Complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice; 4. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a), any appeal of this Order would not be taken in good faith and Plaintiff is accordingly denied leave to appeal in forma pauperis. Plaintiff remains free to apply to proceed in forma pauperis in the Court of Appeals; and 5. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly, whereupon this case is TERMINATED on the docket of this Court. IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: 11/21/18 s/ Timothy S. Black Timothy S. Black United States District Judge 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.