Haywood v. Gifford et al, No. 1:2017cv00398 - Document 15 (S.D. Ohio 2017)
Court Description: DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING 11 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. With the exception of Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claim against Defendant Gifford in his individual capacity, all of Plaintiff's claims are DI SMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Plaintiff may proceed only with his Eighth Amendment claim against Defendant Gifford in his individual capacity. Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 11/21/17. (sct)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Haywood v. Gifford et al Doc. 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION DAYMOND HAYWOOD, Plaintiff, vs. NICHOLAS GIFFORD, et al., Defendants. : : : : : : : : : Case No. 1:17-cv-398 Judge Timothy S. Black Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Doc. 11) This case is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Western Division to United States Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz. Pursuant to such reference, the Magistrate Judge reviewed the pleadings filed with this Court, and on October 4, 2017, submitted a Report and Recommendation. (Doc. 11). No objections were filed. As required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Court has reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge and considered de novo all of the filings in this matter. Upon consideration of the foregoing, the Court does determine that such Report and Recommendation should be and is hereby adopted in its entirety. Accordingly: 1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 11) is ADOPTED in its entirety; Dockets.Justia.com 2. With the exception of Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment claim against Defendant Gifford in his individual capacity, all of Plaintiff’s claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B) and 1915A(b)(1); and 3. Plaintiff may proceed only with his Eighth Amendment claim against Defendant Gifford in his individual capacity. IT IS SO ORDERED. 11/21/17 Date: ___________ ______________________ Timothy S. Black United States District Judge 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
