Nitsche v. Aldridge et al, No. 1:2017cv00317 - Document 9 (S.D. Ohio 2017)

Court Description: DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING 8 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Plaintiff's complaint 3 is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure of service. This case is TERMINATED on the docket of this court. Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 12/18/17. (sct)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

Download PDF
Nitsche v. Aldridge et al Doc. 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION LUIS NITSCHE, Case No. 1:17-cv-317 Plaintiff, Judge Timothy S. Black vs. Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz ALLYSON ALDRIDGE, et al., Defendants. DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Doc. 8) AND TERMINATING THIS CASE This case is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Western Division to United States Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz. Pursuant to such reference, the Magistrate Judge reviewed the pleadings and memoranda filed with this Court, and on December 1, 2017, submitted a Report and Recommendation. (Doc. 8). No objections were filed. As required by 29 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Court has reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge and considered de novo all of the filings in this matter. Upon consideration of the foregoing, the Court does determine that such Report and Recommendation should be and is hereby ADOPTED in its entirety. Accordingly: 1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 8) is ADOPTED; Dockets.Justia.com 2. Plaintiff’s complaint (Doc. 3) is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure of service; and 3. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly, whereupon this case is TERMINATED on the docket of this Court. IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: ____________ 12/18/17 _______________________ Timothy S. Black United States District Judge 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.