Jones v. US Bank National Association et al, No. 1:2017cv00174 - Document 5 (S.D. Ohio 2017)
Court Description: DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING 2 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED AS DUPLICATIVE under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). The Court certifies that an appeal of this Order would not be taken in faith and denies Plaintiff leave to appeal in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 4/18/17. (gs)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Jones v. US Bank National Association et al Doc. 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION DERRYN NICOLE JONES, et al. Plaintiffs, vs. U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, et al., Defendants. : : : : : : : : : : Case No. 1:17-cv-174 Judge Timothy S. Black Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Doc. 2) This case is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Western Division to United States Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz. Pursuant to such reference, the Magistrate Judge reviewed the pleadings filed with this Court and, on March 28, 2017, submitted a Report and Recommendation. (Doc. 2). Plaintiff filed objections on April 11, 2017. (Doc. 3). 1 As required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Court has reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge and considered de novo all of the filings in this matter. Upon consideration of the foregoing, the Court does 1 Plaintiffs’ objections are not well-taken. As the Report and Recommendation establishes, Plaintiffs’ allegations in this complaint are duplicative of allegations made against the same Defendants in another case currently before this Court. Plaintiffs’ objections fail to address this. 1 Dockets.Justia.com determine that such Report and Recommendation should be and is hereby adopted in its entirety. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: 1) Plaintiff’s complaint is DISMISSED AS DUPLICATIVE under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) 2) The Court certifies that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), an appeal of this Order would not be taken in good faith and therefore Plaintiff is denied leave to appeal in forma pauperis. 3) The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly, whereupon this case shall be CLOSED. IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: 4/18/17 ________________________ Timothy S. Black United States District Judge 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
