Thomas v. Sheriff, Scioto County Jail, No. 1:2017cv00120 - Document 7 (S.D. Ohio 2017)

Court Description: DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING 6 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Petitioner's motion to withdraw her petition for a writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 5) is GRANTED. Petitioner's petition for a writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED. Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 5/3/17. (gs)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

Download PDF
Thomas v. Sheriff, Scioto County Jail Doc. 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION TONIA THOMAS, Petitioner, vs. SHERIFF, SCIOTO, COUNTY JAIL, Respondent. : : : : : : : : : : Case No. 1:17-cv-120 Judge Timothy S. Black Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Doc. 6) This case is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Western Division to United States Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman. Pursuant to such reference, the Magistrate Judge reviewed the pleadings filed with this Court and, on March 31, 2017, submitted a Report and Recommendation. (Doc. 6). No objections were filed. As required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Court has reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge and considered de novo all of the filings in this matter. Upon consideration of the foregoing, the Court does determine that such Report and Recommendations should be and is hereby adopted in its entirety. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: 1) Petitioner’s motion to withdraw her petition for a writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 5) is GRANTED; 1 Dockets.Justia.com 2) Petitioner’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED. IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: 5/3/17 Timothy S. Black United States District Judge 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.