Lester v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections et al, No. 1:2016cv01065 - Document 11 (S.D. Ohio 2016)

Court Description: DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Doc. 7 ). Plaintiff's claim against the Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 12/15/2016. (mr)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

Download PDF
Lester v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections et al Doc. 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION JIMMIE LESTER, Plaintiff, vs. DEANN OSGOOD, Defendant. : : : : : : : : : Case No. 1:16-cv-1065 Judge Timothy S. Black Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Doc. 7) This case is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Western Division to United States Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz. Pursuant to such reference, the Magistrate Judge reviewed the pleadings filed with this Court and, on November 30, 2016, submitted a Report and Recommendation. (Doc. 7). No objections were filed. 1 As required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Court has reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge and considered de novo all of the filings in this matter. Upon consideration of the foregoing, the Court does determine that such Report and Recommendations should be and is hereby adopted in their entirety. In fact, Plaintiff filed a memorandum stating that he “concur[ed] with the Magistrate’s decision to dismiss the Complaint in conjunction to the Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections.” (Doc. 9 at 2). 1 Dockets.Justia.com Accordingly, Plaintiff’s claim against the Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. IT IS SO ORDERED. 12/15/16 Date: ______________ _______________________ Timothy S. Black United States District Judge 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.