McDougald V. Mahlman, No. 1:2016cv00317 - Document 36 (S.D. Ohio 2016)

Court Description: DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Doc. 6 ). Plaintiff may proceed with his: (1) First Amendment retaliation claims relating to the alleged retaliatory conduct reports and cell search ag ainst Defendants Mahlman and Lancaster; (2) Eighth Amendment failure to protect claim against Defendant Mahlman; and (3) access to the courts claim against Defendants Bailey and Nolan. All other claims are dismissed on the ground that Plaintiff has failed to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 7/13/2016. (mr)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

Download PDF
McDougald V. Mahlman Doc. 36 Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.