Heath v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution, No. 1:2015cv00541 - Document 12 (S.D. Ohio 2016)

Court Description: DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Doc. 10 ). Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 9/19/2016. (mr)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

Download PDF
Heath v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution Doc. 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION DAVID DOUGLAS HEATH, Petitioner, vs. WARDEN, CHILLICOTHE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION Respondent. : : : : : : : : : : Case No. 1:15-cv-541 Judge Timothy S. Black Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Doc. 10) This case is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Western Division to United States Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman. Pursuant to such reference, the Magistrate Judge reviewed the pleadings filed with this Court and, on June 3, 2016, submitted a Report and Recommendation. (Doc. 10). No objections were filed. As required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Court has reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge and considered de novo all of the filings in this matter. Upon consideration of the foregoing, the Court does determine that such Report and Recommendations should be and is hereby adopted in its entirety. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: 1) Respondent’s motion to dismiss (Doc. 4) is GRANTED; 1 Dockets.Justia.com 2) Petitioner’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Clerk shall enter Judgment accordingly, whereupon this case shall be TERMINATED in this Court. IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: 9/19/16 s/ Timothy S. Black Timothy S. Black United States District Judge 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.