Mohammed v. Complete Personnel Logistics, No. 1:2015cv00414 - Document 23 (S.D. Ohio 2016)

Court Description: DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 20 Report and Recommendations. This action is dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk shall enter Judgment accordingly, whereupon this case shall be terminated in this Court. Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 8/12/16. (sct)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

Download PDF
Mohammed v. Complete Personnel Logistics Doc. 23 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AL-MAHDI FARAD MOHAMMED, : : Plaintiff, : : vs. : : COMPLETE PERSONNEL LOGISTICS, : : Defendant. : Case No. 1:15-cv-414 Judge Timothy S. Black Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Doc. 20) This case is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Western Division to United States Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz. Pursuant to such reference, the Magistrate Judge reviewed the pleadings filed with this Court and, on June 6, 2016, submitted a Report and Recommendation. (Doc. 20). Plaintiff filed objections. (Doc. 22).1 As required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Court has reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge and considered de novo all of the filings in this matter. Upon consideration of the foregoing, the Court does Plaintiff’s objections call into question the impartiality of the Magistrate Judge and suggest that both defense counsel and employees of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) have purposefully misled the Court in their filings. (Doc. 22). Plaintiff further argues that the false statements he made to the Magistrate Judge at an evidentiary hearing on June 23, 2016, were made in error and not intentionally. (Id.). However, the Court notes that Plaintiff’s objections make no attempt to explain the copy of the EEOC charge he submitted that the Magistrate Judge found to be altered for the purpose of defrauding the Court. (See Doc. 20, at 7). Based on that finding, the Magistrate Judge’s recommendation that the case be dismissed with prejudice is entirely appropriate. 1 1 Dockets.Justia.com determine that such Report and Recommendations should be and is hereby adopted in its entirety. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that this action be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Clerk shall enter Judgment accordingly, whereupon this case shall be TERMINATED in this Court. Date: 8/12/16 s/ Timothy S. Black Timothy S. Black United States District Judge 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.