Mosley v. Commissioner of Social Security, No. 1:2015cv00208 - Document 34 (S.D. Ohio 2017)

Court Description: DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING 33 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Plaintiff's 31 Motion for Attorney Fees is GRANTED. The Clerk shall enter judgment for Plaintiff and against Defendant for recovery of $5,018.00 in attorney fees. This case shall be CLOSED in this Court. Signed by Judge Timothy S. Black on 12/15/17. (sct)

Download PDF
Mosley v. Commissioner of Social Security Doc. 34 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION TIMOTHY S. MOSLEY, Plaintiff, vs. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. : : : : : : : : : Case No. 1:15-cv-208 Judge Timothy S. Black Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Doc. 33) This case is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Western Division to United States Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz. Pursuant to such reference, the Magistrate Judge reviewed the pleadings filed with this Court, and, on September 5, 2017, submitted a Report and Recommendation. (Doc. 33). No objections were filed. As required by 29 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Court has reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge and considered de novo all of the filings in this matter. Upon consideration of the foregoing, the Court does determine that such Report and Recommendation should be and is hereby adopted in its entirety. Accordingly: 1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 33) is ADOPTED; and 2. Plaintiff’s motion for attorney fees (Doc. 31) is GRANTED; and Dockets.Justia.com 3. The Clerk shall enter judgment for Plaintiff and against Defendant for recovery of $5,018.00 in attorney fees; whereupon this case shall be CLOSED in this Court. IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: ____________ 12/15/17 _______________________ Timothy S. Black United States District Judge 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.