Raglin v. Mitchell, No. 1:2000cv00767 - Document 149 (S.D. Ohio 2009)
Court Description: DECISION AND ORDER ON AMENDED MOTION FOR DISCOVERY - Petitioner's Amended Motion for Discovery (Doc. No. 147) is DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz on 5/13/2009. (kopf1, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON WALTER RAGLIN, : Petitioner, Case No. 1:00-cv-767 : District Judge Michael R. Barrett Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz -vsBETTY MITCHELL, Warden, : Respondent. DECISION AND ORDER ON AMENDED MOTION FOR DISCOVERY This capital habeas corpus case is before the Court on Petitioner s Amended Motion for Discovery (Doc. No. 147). Having read the deposition of Robert Ranz1 upon which the Amended Motion is based, the Court remains unpersuaded that Petitioner has shown good cause for the requested additional discovery. The Amended Motion is accordingly DENIED. May 13, 2009. s/ Michael R. Merz United States Magistrate Judge 1 Mr. Ranz was one of Petitioner s counsel at trial. -1-
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
