Bache v. Special Counsel, Inc. et al, No. 5:2020cv02585 - Document 16 (N.D. Ohio 2021)
Court Description: Memorandum of Opinion and Order that Bache amend his complaint, with the proposed amendments contained in the motion, within seven days of the date of this Order. The parties are compelled to arbitrate any claims in the forthcoming amended complaint. Further proceedings in the within cause are hereby perpetually stayed and the within case is hereby CLOSED, subject to reopening upon a well-taken written motion. (Related Docs. # 14 & 15 ) Judge John R. Adams on 2/4/21. (K,C)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Bache v. Special Counsel, Inc. et al Doc. 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION Daniel Bache, Plaintiff, v. Special Counsel, Inc., et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO.: 5:20-cv-02585 JUDGE JOHN R. ADAMS MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER (Resolves Docs. 14 and 15) On February 3, 2021, Plaintiff Daniel Bache (“Bache”) filed an unopposed motion to amend the complaint. As requested in the motion, this Court hereby ORDERS that Bache amend his complaint, with the proposed amendments contained in the motion, within seven days of the date of this Order. On February 3, 2021, the parties filed a joint motion requesting this Court refer this matter to arbitration. The Sixth Circuit has noted that the Court may choose two courses of action when confronted with claims that are subject to arbitration. See Hensel v. Cargill, Inc., 198 F.3d 245 (6th Cir. 1999) (table decision); ATAC Corp. v. Arthur Treacher’s, Inc., 280 F.3d 1091 (6th Cir. 2002). In past cases, this Court has consistently followed one approach and will continue to do so herein. The Court believes that its practice protects the parties’ rights and promotes judicial economy. Accordingly, the parties are compelled to arbitrate any claims in the forthcoming amended complaint. Further proceedings in the within cause are hereby perpetually stayed and the within case is hereby CLOSED, subject to reopening upon a well-taken written motion of Plaintiff, Defendants, or any other proper party in interest, after the final decision of the Arbitrator. Dockets.Justia.com IT IS SO ORDERED. DATE: February 4, 2021 /s/ John R. Adams Judge John R. Adams UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
