Kalb v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration, No. 5:2014cv01128 - Document 16 (N.D. Ohio 2014)
Court Description: Memorandum Opinion and Order: Upon consideration of the parties' Joint Stipulation (re 15 ), the Court hereby remands the case for further proceedings consistent with the parties' Joint Stipulation and enters judgment in favor of Plaintiff. Magistrate Judge Kathleen B. Burke on 11/26/2014. (D,I)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Kalb v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration Doc. 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO GALE KALB, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 5:14-CV-1128 MAGISTRATE JUDGE KATHLEEN BURKE MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER On November 25, 2014, the parties filed a Joint Proposed Stipulation to Remand under Sentence Four of section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), wherein they request that the Court remand the case for further proceedings and enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff. Doc. 15 (“Joint Stipulation”). The parties stipulate that: Upon remand, the agency will afford Plaintiff the opportunity for a new hearing before an ALJ, where Plaintiff may testify and present additional arguments and evidence. The ALJ will further evaluate the claimant’s credibility, address the opinions from the Veteran’s Administration and address the discrepancies between the opinions of the state agency reviewing physicians. The ALJ will also consider whether additional testimony from medical or vocational experts is necessary. The ALJ will proceed through the sequential evaluation process as needed to reach a de novo decision. Doc. 15. Upon consideration of the parties’ Joint Stipulation, the Court hereby remands the case for further proceedings consistent with the parties’ Joint Stipulation and enters judgment in favor of Plaintiff. Dated: November 26, 2014 ____________________________________ Kathleen B. Burke United States Magistrate Judge Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
