Horne v. Goodrich, No. 5:2012cv02274 - Document 16 (N.D. Ohio 2014)
Court Description: Memorandum of Opinion and Order For the reasons stated in the Order, the Court adopts the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation 14 and dismisses the petition for writ of habeas corpus 1 . Signed by Judge Dan Aaron Polster on 12/29/2014. (K,K)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Horne v. Goodrich Doc. 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION Marshawn Horne, Petitioner, vs. Jason Bunting, Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 5:12CV2274 JUDGE DAN AARON POLSTER MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge George J. Limbert (“R & R”) (Doc. # 14). The R&R recommends that Petitioner Marshawn Horne’s 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. # 1) be dismissed. Under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), a habeas petitioner has 14 days after being served a copy of the R&R to file written objections. A copy of the R&R was mailed to Petitioner on December 3, 2014.1 In this case, more than 14 days have elapsed since the R&R was sent to Petitioner, and Petitioner has filed neither an objection nor a request for an extension of time to file one. Failure to file objections by the deadline constitutes a waiver of the right to obtain a de novo review of the R&R in the district court, United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947, 949 (6th Cir. 1981), and a waiver of the right to appeal. Thomas v. Arn, 728 F.2d 813 (6th Cir. 1984), 1 On 11/14/2014, the Court mailed a copy of the R&R to the Petitioner and addressed it to the Lake Erie Correctional Institution. On 12/2/2014, Respondent’s counsel informed the Court that Petitioner had been transferred to the Marion Correctional Institution. As a result, on December 3, 2014, t he Court mailed a copy of the R&R to Petitioner and addressed it to the Marion Correctional Institution. Dockets.Justia.com aff’d, 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Thomas v. Arn, 728 F.2d 813 (6th Cir. 1984), aff’d, 474 U.S. 140 (1985). The Court has reviewed the Magistrate Judge’s R&R and agrees that the petition should be dismissed. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge’s R&R (Doc. # 14) and DISMISSES the petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. # 1). IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/ Dan Aaron Polster December 29, 2014 Dan Aaron Polster United States District Judge -2-
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
