Bunting v. Beightler, No. 5:2008cv01700 - Document 5 (N.D. Ohio 2008)

Court Description: Judgment Entry. This Court having contemporaneously filed its Memorandum of Opinion in this case, it is therefore ordered that this action is dismissed pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. Further, the Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith and that there is no basis upon which to issue a certificate of appealability. Related document 4 Memorandum Opinion and Order. Judge Christopher A. Boyko on 09/11/08. (M,M)

Download PDF

Bunting v. Beightler Doc. 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO LARRY A. BUNTING, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Petitioner, v. MAGGIE BEIGHTLER, Respondent. CASE NO. 5:08 CV 1700 JUDGE CHRISTOPHER A. BOYKO JUDGMENT ENTRY This Court having contemporaneously filed its Memorandum of Opinion in this case, it is therefore ORDERED that this action is dismissed pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. Further, the Court CERTIFIES pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915(a)(3) that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith, and that there is no basis on which to issue a certificate of appealability. Fed.R.App.P. 22(b); 28 U.S.C. § 2253. S/Christopher A. Boyko CHRISTOPHER A. BOYKO UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE September 11, 2008 Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.