Morris v. Eberling, No. 5:2007cv01870 - Document 18 (N.D. Ohio 2008)

Court Description: Judgment Entry. The Court has filed its Opinion and Order in the above-captioned matter. Furthermore, the Court finds that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith. 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3). Petitioner has not made a substa ntial showing of the denial of a constitutional right; therefore, the Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 2253(c)(2); Fed.R.App.P.22. Accordingly, this action is terminated pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58, Related document 17 Order Adopting Report and Recommendation. Judge Christopher A. Boyko on 11/25/08. (M,M)

Download PDF
Morris v. Eberling Doc. 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO MARTIN D. MORRIS Plaintiff(s), v. MICHELLE EBERLIN Defendant(s). ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 5:07CV1870 JUDGMENT The Court has filed its Opinion and Order in the above-captioned matter. Furthermore, the Court finds that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith. 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3). Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right; therefore, the Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 2253(c)(2); Fed.R.App.P.22. Accordingly, this action is terminated pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58. IT IS SO ORDERED. S/Christopher A. Boyko HONORABLE CHRISTOPHER A. BOYKO UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE November 25, 2008 Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.