Alarcon v. Transunion Marketing Solutions, Inc. et al, No. 5:2007cv00230 - Document 112 (N.D. Ohio 2008)
Court Description: Judgment Entry that for the reasons set forth in the Memorandum Opinion and Order 111 filed contemporaneously with this Judgment Entry, the defendant Collection Consultants of California's motion for summary judgment (Document 85 ) is Granted as to count II and defendant's motion for summary judgment (Document 85 ) is Denied as to count III as to claims under the FCRA arising on or after January 26, 2005. Signed by Judge David D. Dowd, Jr. on 9/30/2008. (M,De)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Alarcon v. Transunion Marketing Solutions, Inc. et al Doc. 112 DOWD, J. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION Tina Alarcon, Plaintiff, v. Transunion Marketing Solutions, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 5:07 CV 230 JUDGMENT ENTRY For the reasons set forth in the Memorandum Opinion and Order filed contemporaneously with this Judgment Entry, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that defendant Collection Consultants of California’s motion for summary judgment (Document 85) is GRANTED as to count II; IT IS FURTHER HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that defendant’s motion for summary judgment (Document 85) is DENIED as to count III as to claims under the FCRA arising on or after January 26, 2005. IT IS SO ORDERED. September 30, 2008 Date S/ David D. Dowd, Jr. David D. Dowd, Jr. U.S. District Judge Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
