Allen v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction et al, No. 4:2020cv01746 - Document 19 (N.D. Ohio 2021)
Court Description: Memorandum of Opinion and Order The Court denies ECF No. 3 as duplicative. The Court will rule on the substance of ECF No. 5 in due course. Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 2/25/2021. (JLG)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Allen v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction et al Doc. 19 PEARSON, J. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION BRANDON M. ALLEN, Plaintiff, v. OHIO DEPARTMENT OF REHABILITATION AND CORRECTION, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 4:20CV1746 JUDGE BENITA Y. PEARSON MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER [Resolving ECF No. 3] Pending before the Court are two nearly identical motions, filed by Plaintiff, seeking the appointment of counsel. ECF Nos. 3, 5. The Court denies ECF No. 3 as duplicative. The Court will rule on the substance of ECF No. 5 in due course. IT IS SO ORDERED. February 25, 2021 Date /s/ Benita Y. Pearson Benita Y. Pearson United States District Judge Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
