Mayes v Eli Lilly and Company et al., No. 4:2014cv01759 - Document 30 (N.D. Ohio 2015)
Court Description: Memorandum of Opinion and Order For the reasons set forth herein, the Court grants Defendant's Motion to Dismiss the Fifth and Sixth Causes of Action of Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint in its entirety. ECF No. 19 . Counts Five and Six of Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint are hereby dismissed. The case shall proceed on Counts 1 through 4. Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 4/30/2015. (JLG)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Mayes v Eli Lilly and Company et al. Doc. 30 PEARSON, J. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION GREGORY MAYES, Plaintiff, v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 4:14cv1759 JUDGE BENITA Y. PEARSON MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER [Resolving ECF No. 19] Pending before the Court is Defendant Eli Lilly and Company’s Motion to Dismiss the Fifth and Sixth Causes of Action of Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint. ECF No. 19. Defendant filed the instant motion of February 26, 2015. Under the Local Rules, Plaintiff Gregory Mayes had until March 30, 2015 to file an opposition to the motion to dismiss. See Local Rule 7.1(d) (requiring each party opposing a dispositive motion to serve and file its memorandum in opposition within thirty days). To date, no opposition has been filed. See ECF No. 24 (noticing that the motion to dismiss can be treated as unopposed under the Local Rules). During the April 29, 2015 Case Management Conference, the Court discussed the pending motion to dismiss with the parties. Defendant further elaborated on its position that the fifth and sixth causes of action should be dismissed. As important, Plaintiff, through counsel, informed the Court that he did not oppose granting the motion. The Court has been advised, having reviewed the record, Defendant’s brief, the applicable law, and the parties’ positions. Accordingly, the Court hereby grants Defendant’s Dockets.Justia.com (4:14cv1759) Motion to Dismiss the Fifth and Sixth Causes of Action of Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint in its entirety. ECF No. 19. Counts Five and Six of Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint (ECF No. 15 at 14–15) are hereby dismissed. The case shall proceed on Counts 1 through 4. ECF No. 15 at 9–13. IT IS SO ORDERED. April 30, 2015 Date /s/ Benita Y. Pearson Benita Y. Pearson United States District Judge 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
