Rivera v. Commissioner of Social Security, No. 4:2012cv00147 - Document 26 (N.D. Ohio 2016)

Court Description: Memorandum Opinion and Order. For the reasons set forth in this Order, the Magistrate Judge's 25 Report and Recommendation is adopted and the final decision of the Commissioner is Affirmed. Judge John R. Adams on 08/11/2016. (M,TL)

Download PDF
Rivera v. Commissioner of Social Security Doc. 26 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION FELIX ORTIZ RIVERIA, Plaintiff, -vsCOMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. ) CASE NO. 4:12 CV 147 ) ) JUDGE JOHN R. ADAMS ) ) ) MEMORANDUM OF OPINION ) AND ORDER ) ) ) On July 21, 2016 the Magistrate Judge in this matter submitted a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 25) recommending that the Court AFFIRM the Commissioner’s decision. Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), if the parties wish to object to the proposed findings and recommendation they must do so by filing specific written objections within the fourteen (14) day period following service of the Report and Recommendation. In this matter, no objections, or requests for extension of time, were filed within the prescribed period. Further review by this Court at this time would be a duplicative and inefficient use of the Court’s limited resources. Thomas v. Arn, 728 F.2d 813 (6th Cir. 1984); Howard v. Sec’y of Health and Human Servs., 932 F.2d 505 (6th Cir. 1991); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947, 949-50 (6th Cir. 1981). Accordingly, Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted. The final decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED. IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/ John R. Adams JOHN R. ADAMS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO Dated: August 11, 2016 Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.