Adams v. Hudson, No. 4:2007cv00780 - Document 27 (N.D. Ohio 2008)

Court Description: Memorandum, Opinion and Order Adopting Report and Recommendation. Petitioner's motion for evidentiary hearing is denied; respondent's motion to dismiss is granted. Signed by Judge Jack Zouhary on 3/21/08. (B,CJ) Modified on 3/26/2008 (B,TM).

Download PDF
Adams v. Hudson Doc. 27 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION Wilson Adams, Case No. 4:07 CV 780 Petitioner, MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER -vsJUDGE JACK ZOUHARY Stuart Hudson, Respondent. The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge filed February 13, 2008 in this matter. Under the relevant statute (28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) (1982)): Within ten days after being served with a copy, any party may serve and file written objections to such proposed findings and recommendations as provided by rules of court. A judge of the court shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made. In this case, the Court granted Petitioner an extension until March 17, 2008 to file Objections (Doc. No. 26). No Objections have been filed. The failure to file written objections constitutes a waiver of a de novo determination by the district court of an issue covered in the report. United States v. Sullivan, 431 F.3d 976, 984 (2005). The Court adopts the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 24) in its entirety. Petitioner’s Motion for Evidentiary Hearing (Docket No. 8) is denied and Respondent’s Motion to Dismiss (Docket No 13) is granted. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/ Jack Zouhary JACK ZOUHARY U. S. DISTRICT JUDGE March 21, 2008 Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.