Carr v. Commissioner of Social Security, No. 3:2018cv01639 - Document 19 (N.D. Ohio 2019)
Court Description: Memorandum Opinion and Order: I agree with Judge Burke's conclusion that the Commissioner's decision should be reversed, and the matter remanded for further proceedings. I order such reversal and remand. re 18 Judge Jeffrey J. Helmick on 8/8/2019. (S,AL)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Carr v. Commissioner of Social Security Doc. 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION Aileen R. Carr, Case No. 3:18-cv-1639 Plaintiff v. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant Before me is the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Kathleen B. Burke filed on April 24, 2019, in the above-entitled action. (Doc. No. 18). Under the relevant statute: Within [fourteen (14)] days after being served a copy of these proposed Findings and Recommendation, any party who wishes to object must file and serve written objections or further appeal is waived. United States v. Campbell, 261 F.3d 628, 631-32 (6th Cir. 2001) (citation omitted); see also 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (effective Dec. 1, 2009); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2). In this case, the fourteen-day period has elapsed, and no objections have been filed. Following review of Judge Burke’s Report and Recommendation, I agree with Judge Burke’s conclusion that the Commissioner’s decision should be reversed, and the matter remanded for further proceedings. I hereby order such reversal and remand. So Ordered. s/ Jeffrey J. Helmick United States District Judge Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
