Kaufmann v. Ohio Edison Company, No. 3:2009cv02517 - Document 45 (N.D. Ohio 2010)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. The Court adopts the R&R (Doc. No. 44) in its entirety. Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 27) is granted. Judge Jack Zouhary on 12/29/10. (G,D)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Kaufmann v. Ohio Edison Company Doc. 45 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION Paul Kaufmann, Case No. 3:09 CV 2517 Plaintiff, MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER -vsJUDGE JACK ZOUHARY Ohio Edison Company, Defendant. The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. No. 44). Under the relevant statute (28 U.S.C. § 636(C)): Within fourteen days after being served with a copy, any party may serve and file written objections to such proposed findings and recommendations as provided by rules of court. A judge of the court shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made. In this case, no objections have been filed. The failure to file written objections constitutes a waiver of a de novo determination by the district court of an issue covered in the R&R. United States v. Sullivan, 431 F.3d 976, 984 (6th Cir. 2005). The Court adopts the R&R (Doc. No. 44) in its entirety. Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 27) is granted. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/ Jack Zouhary JACK ZOUHARY U. S. DISTRICT JUDGE December 29, 2010 Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
