Squirek v. Commissioner of Social Security, No. 1:2023cv00726 - Document 11 (N.D. Ohio 2024)

Court Description: Opinion and Order: The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 10 ) and ADOPTS the same. Accordingly, the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying Plaintiff's application for disability insurance benefits is AFFIRMED. The case is dismissed. Judge Bridget Meehan Brennan on 4/15/2024. (H,AR)

Download PDF
Squirek v. Commissioner of Social Security Doc. 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION LISA L. SQUIREK, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 1:23-cv-00726 JUDGE BRIDGET MEEHAN BRENNAN OPINION AND ORDER Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) of Magistrate Judge Amanda M. Knapp, recommending that the Commissioner of Social Security’s decision (“Commissioner”) denying Plaintiff Lisa L. Squirek’s (“Plaintiff”) application for disability insurance benefits be affirmed. (Doc. No. 10.) Under the relevant statute: Within fourteen days after being served with a copy, any party may serve and file written objections to such proposed findings and recommendations as provided by rules of court. A judge of the court shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) (flush language). Pursuant to Local Rule 72.2(b), the matter was referred to the magistrate judge for a report and recommendation. The R&R was issued on March 18, 2024, and specifically noted the timeline for stating objections and the possible consequence for failing to do so. (Doc. No. 10 at PageID 549.) Plaintiff has been represented by counsel throughout these proceedings. No objection to the R&R has been filed, and the deadline for stating any objection has passed. The failure to timely file written objections to a report and recommendation of a magistrate judge constitutes a Dockets.Justia.com waiver of de novo review by the district court. United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947, 949-50 (6th Cir. 1981); Thomas v. Arn, 728 F.2d 813, 814-15 (6th Cir. 1984), aff’d, 474 U.S. 140 (1985). The failure to file written objections also results in a waiver of the right to appeal. Thomas, 728 F.2d at 815. The Court has reviewed the R&R and ADOPTS the same. Accordingly, the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying Plaintiff’s application for disability insurance benefits is AFFIRMED. The case is dismissed. IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: April 15, 2024 ____________________________________ BRIDGET MEEHAN BRENNAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.