King v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al, No. 1:2022cv00713 - Document 7 (N.D. Ohio 2022)

Court Description: Opinion and Order: The Court ADOPTS the Supplemental Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. 5 ); GRANTS IN PART Defendant's Motion as to dismiss his petition (Doc. 4 ) and DENIES Defendant's requests legal forms. Judge Christopher A. Boyko on 11/17/2022. (L,Ja)

Download PDF
King v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al Doc. 7 Case: 1:22-cv-00713-CAB Doc #: 7 Filed: 11/17/22 1 of 2. PageID #: 45 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION KARL L. KING, Petitioner, vs. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, et al., Respondents. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 1:22-CV-00713 SENIOR JUDGE CHRISTOPHER A. BOYKO OPINION AND ORDER CHRISTOPHER A. BOYKO, SR. J.: This matter is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 5) pertaining to Petitioner’s Motion to Dismiss Case without Prejudice and Motion for Required Information. (Doc. 4.) The Report and Recommendation recommends the dismissal of his petition and deny his request for legal forms. Objections to the Supplemental Report and Recommendation were due by October 3, 2022. Neither party has filed an objection. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b) provides that objections to a report and recommendation must be filed within fourteen days after service. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2). Both parties have failed to timely file any such objection. Therefore, the Court must assume that the parties are satisfied with the Magistrate Judge’s recommendation. Any further review by this Court would be duplicative and an inefficient use of the Court’s limited resources. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 155 (1985); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947, 949-50 (6th Cir. 1981). Dockets.Justia.com Case: 1:22-cv-00713-CAB Doc #: 7 Filed: 11/17/22 2 of 2. PageID #: 46 Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Supplemental Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. 5); GRANTS IN PART Defendant’s Motion as to dismiss his petition (Doc. 4) and DENIES Defendant’s requests legal forms. IT IS SO ORDERED. /s Christopher A. Boyko CHRISTOPHER A. BOYKO Senior United States District Judge Dated: November 17, 2022

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.