Lubrizol Corporation v. International Business Machines Corporation, No. 1:2021cv00870 - Document 243 (N.D. Ohio 2024)
Court Description: Opinion and Order denying in part Defendant's 43 and 44 Partial Motion to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint. The Court will holdthe remaining issues in abeyance pending oral argument. The Court will contact theparties for scheduling separate from this Order. Judge Christopher A. Boyko on 9/30/2024. (F,AW)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Dockets.Justia.com UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION THE LUBRIZOL CORPORATION, Plaintiff, vs. INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 1:21-CV-870 JUDGE CHRISTOPHER A. BOYKO OPINION AND ORDER CHRISTOPHER A. BOYKO, J.: Lubrizol Corporation v. International Business Machines Corporation Doc. 243 DENIED IN PART. BACKGROUND FACTS LAW AND ARGUMENT Directv, Inc. v. Treesh, Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, Id. Craighead v. E.F. Hutton & Co., Ashcroft v. Iqbal, Twombly Id. Amini v. Oberlin Coll., Phillips v. Philip Morris Cos., Id Phillips v. Philip Morris Cos. Inc., Michelson v. Volkswagen, Id. Id. Id. Id. Id. Id. Id. Blankenship v. CFMOTO Powersports, Inc., Rui He v. Rom, Rui He DENIES IT IS SO ORDERED. /s Christopher A. Boyko CHRISTOPHER A. BOYKO United States District Judge Dated: September 30, 2024
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
