Village of Walton Hills et al v. Village of Walton Hills et al, No. 1:2020cv01772 - Document 28 (N.D. Ohio 2021)
Court Description: Memorandum Opinion and Order. Defendants' Partial Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (R. 18 ) is DENIED, without prejudice, as moot. Magistrate Judge David A. Ruiz on 4/7/2021. (G,CA)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Village of Walton Hills et al v. Village of Walton Hills et al Doc. 28 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION VILLAGE OF WALTON HILLS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. VILLAGE OF WALTON HILLS, et al., ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 1:20-cv-01772 MAGISTRATE JUDGE DAVID A. RUIZ MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Defendants. Now pending before this court is the Partial Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings pursuant to Rule 12(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure filed by Defendants Village of Walton Hills, Village of Walton Hills Planning Commission, Donald Kolograf and Robert Kalman, by and through counsel. (R. 18). On March 15, 2021, Plaintiff filed an Amended Complaint (R. 24), which was timely filed pursuant to the deadlines set in this Court’s Case Management Order dated October 26, 2020. (R. 16, PageID# 107). The Amended Complaint renders moot the pending motion (R. 18). Therefore, the Partial Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (R. 18) is DENIED, without prejudice, as moot. IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: April 7, 2021 s/ David A. Ruiz United States Magistrate Judge Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
