Rasheed v. Rini et al, No. 1:2018cv02240 - Document 3 (N.D. Ohio 2019)

Court Description: Opinion & Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 1/25/19. The Court, for the reasons set forth in this order, denies plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis and dismisses this action without prejudice. Should the plaintiff wish to pursue this action, he must file a new case accompanied by the full filing fee of $400, or an application to proceed in forma pauperis demonstrating he meets the criteria of poverty. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith. (Related Doc. 2 ) (D,MA)

Download PDF
Rasheed v. Rini et al Doc. 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO ------------------------------------------------------: SHAREEF MALIK RASHEED, : : Plaintiff, : : vs. : : : THOMAS M. RINI, et al., : : Defendants. : : ------------------------------------------------------- CASE NO. 1:18 CV 2240 OPINION & ORDER JAMES S. GWIN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE: Pro se Plaintiff Shareef Malik Rasheed has filed a civil complaint in this matter alleging claims under 42 U.S.C. § l983 and state law against three defendants, including the City of Cleveland Heights, seeking damages and other relief. (Doc. No. 1.) He did not pay the filing fee, but instead submitted an application to proceed in forma pauperis. (Doc. No. 2.) Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, a court “may authorize the commencement, prosecution, or defense of any suit, action or proceeding, civil or criminal, or appeal therein, without prepayment of fees or security therefor, by a person who submits an affidavit that includes a statement of all assets such [person] possesses that the person is unable to pay such fees or give security therefor.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). Whether to allow a litigant to proceed in forma pauperis is within the discretion of the district court, and an application is properly denied where the litigant fails to provide information concerning his expenses and financial obligations, as required, such that the court may make a determination as to his ability to pay the filing fee. Flippin v. Coburn, 107 F. App’x 520, 521(6th Cir. 2004). Dockets.Justia.com Case No. 1:18 CV 2240 Gwin, J. The plaintiff has not provided information regarding his income, expenses, and financial situation as directed on his application, or sufficient to allow this Court to find that he meets the criteria of poverty necessary to proceed in forma pauperis. He simply wrote “0” in every blank on his application without any explanation as to how he survives with no income, no assets, no debts, no expenses, and no assistance from others. Because the plaintiff has failed to provide information sufficient to determine whether he meets the criteria to proceed in forma pauperis, his application to do so (Doc. No. 2) is denied, and this action will be dismissed without prejudice. Should the plaintiff wish to pursue his action, he must file a new case accompanied by the full filing fee of $400, or an application to proceed in forma pauperis demonstrating he meets the criteria of poverty. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 25, 2019 s/ James S. Gwin JAMES S. GWIN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE -2-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.