NPF Franchising, LLC v. SY Dawgs, LLC, No. 1:2018cv00277 - Document 288 (N.D. Ohio 2022)

Court Description: Amended Memorandum Opinion and Order. This Amended Memorandum Opinion and Order replaces the Court's Memorandum Opinion and Order dated August 4, 2022, modifying instructions regarding the disbursement of funds as requested by the Finance Department. IT IS SO ORDERED. re 285 , 279 . Judge Donald C. Nugent on 8/25/2022. (M,S)

Download PDF
NPF Franchising, LLC v. SY Dawgs, LLC Doc. 288 Case: 1:18-cv-00277-DCN Doc #: 288 Filed: 08/25/22 1 of 2. PageID #: 6635 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION NPF FRANCHISING LLC, CASE NO. 1:18 CV 277 Plaintiff, JUDGE DONALD C. NUGENT Magistrate Judge William H.Baughman,Jr. SYDAWGS,LLC, AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Defendants. This matter is before the Court on the Motion ofInterested Parties J. Patrick Allen, Kathryn B. Fox, Rick A. Waltman, Tracy A. Warren, and Buchalter, A Professional Corporation, to Release and Order Disbursement of Cash Deposit Supersedeas Bond to Defendants in Satisfaction of Judgment Against the Individual Attomeys. (Docket #279.) The Motion is GRANTED as follows: The Clerk is authorized and directed to disburse the funds deposited in the registry ofthis Court in the amount of$313,000, payable to "JOEL BARTSCH"and mailed or delivered to Defendants' care of"WILLIAM M.HARTER,FROST BROWN TODD LLC, 10 WEST BROAD STREET SUITE 2300, COLUMBUS OHIO 43215." Upon the Clerk's distribution ofthe above deposit to Defendants, the Memorandum Dockets.Justia.com Case: 1:18-cv-00277-DCN Doc #: 288 Filed: 08/25/22 2 of 2. PageID #: 6636 Opinion(Docket #262) and Judgment(Docket #263) against the Individual Attorneys in favor of Defendants will be and is fully and completely satisfied and released ofrecord, and the Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to make an entry ofthe full and complete satisfaction on the docket of said Judgment and Memorandum Opinion as against the Individual Attorneys. Defendants are not restricted from pursuing any remaining claims they may have against Buchalter, nor does this Order restrict Defendants' ability to seek fees and costs from the Individual Attorneys related to proceedings in the Court of Appeals pursuant to Rule 38 ofthe Appellate Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C. §1912 and/or 28 U.S.C. §1927. This Amended Memorandum Opinion and Order replaces the Court's Memorandum Opinion and Order dated August 4,2022, modifying insfructions regarding the disbursement of funds as requested by the Finance Department. IT IS SO ORDERED. DONALD C. NUGENT ' T/ Senior United States Disti istfii t Judge DATED: -2-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.