Gardner v. Commissioner of Social Security, No. 1:2018cv00096 - Document 18 (N.D. Ohio 2019)

Court Description: Memorandum Opinion and Order For the reasons set forth herein, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is hereby adopted. The decision of the Commissioner of Social Security is affirmed. Judgment will be entered in favor of Defendant. Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 2/7/2019. Related document(s) 14 . (S,Ke)

Download PDF
Gardner v. Commissioner of Social Security Doc. 18 PEARSON, J. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION BROOKE GARDNER, Plaintiff, v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, ACTING COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 1:18CV0096 JUDGE BENITA Y. PEARSON MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER An Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) denied Plaintiff Brooke Gardner’s application for disability insurance benefits (“DIB”) after a hearing in the above-captioned case. That decision became the final determination of the Commissioner of Social Security when the Appeals Council denied the request to review the ALJ’s decision. The claimant sought judicial review of the Commissioner’s decision, and the Court referred the case to Magistrate Judge Kathleen B. Burke for preparation of a report and recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 and Local Rule 72.2(b)(1). On January 2, 2019, the magistrate judge submitted a Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 14) recommending that the Court affirm the Commissioner’s decision. Dockets.Justia.com (1:18CV0096) Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2) provides that objections to a report and recommendation must be filed within 14 days after service.1 On February 4, 2019, Plaintiff filed a Response to the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 17), stating that Plaintiff will not be filing objections. Furthermore, the Commissioner has not filed any objections, evidencing satisfaction with the magistrate judge’s recommendations. Any further review by this Court would be a duplicative and inefficient use of the Court’s limited resources. Thomas v. Arn, 728 F.2d 813 (6th Cir. 1984), aff’d, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); Howard v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 932 F.2d 505 (6th Cir. 1991); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947, 949-50 (6th Cir. 1981). Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation of the magistrate judge is hereby adopted. The decision of the Commissioner of Social Security is affirmed. Judgment will be entered in favor of Defendant. IT IS SO ORDERED. February 7, 2019 Date /s/ Benita Y. Pearson Benita Y. Pearson United States District Judge 1 On December 26, 2018, this matter was stayed due to the lapse of congressional appropriations funding the federal government. See General Order 2018-15. The stay was thereafter extended pursuant to General Order 2019-1. On January 25, 2019, the stay expired when the federal government reopened for three weeks. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.