Barath v. Bemer, No. 1:2017cv00776 - Document 10 (N.D. Ohio 2017)

Court Description: Judgment Entry: In accordance with the Court's accompanying Memorandum of Opinion and Order granting the defendant's motion to dismiss, judgment is hereby entered in this matter in favor of the defendant and against the plaintiff. The Court further certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith. (LC,S) re 9

Download PDF
Barath v. Bemer Doc. 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION Mary Barath, Plaintiff, v. Andrew D. Bemer, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 1: 17 CV 776 JUDGE PATRICIA A. GAUGHAN Judgment Entry In accordance with the Court’s accompanying Memorandum of Opinion and Order granting the defendant’s motion to dismiss, judgment is hereby entered in this matter in favor of the defendant and against the plaintiff. The Court further certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith. IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/ Patricia A. Gaughan PATRICIA A. GAUGHAN United States District Judge Chief Judge Dated: 9/27/17 Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.