Wilson-Davis & Co., Inc. v. Mirgliotta et al, No. 1:2016cv03056 - Document 19 (N.D. Ohio 2017)
Court Description: Memorandum of Opinion and Order: This case is before the Court upon Plaintiff Wilson-Davis & Co., Inc.'s Motion for Expedited Discovery in Support of Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Doc. 7 ). Plaintiff's motion is denied at th is time. Defendants have indicated that they intend to file a motion to dismiss. To allow the Court to rule on the motion to dismiss as expeditiously as possible, Plaintiff's brief in opposition will be due fourteen days after the motion is file d, and Defendants' reply will be due seven days thereafter. The Court will rule promptly on the motion. If it is denied, the Court will entertain another motion for expedited discovery and will set a briefing schedule for Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction. The Court understands that Plaintiff may have to file the Submission Agreement with FINRA prior to a ruling on the motion to dismiss; however, the arbitration itself is not scheduled until considerably later in the year. Judge Patricia A. Gaughan on 1/12/17. (LC,S)
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.