Rodick v. Commissioner of Social Security, No. 1:2016cv02723 - Document 20 (N.D. Ohio 2017)
Court Description: Memorandum Opinion and Order adopting the (re 18 ) Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. The decision of the Commissioner is reversed and this matter is remanded for further proceedings. Judge John R. Adams on 10/18/17. (K,C)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Rodick v. Commissioner of Social Security Doc. 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION TAMMY D. RODICK, Plaintiff, -vsCOMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 1:16CV2723 JUDGE JOHN R. ADAMS MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER On September 20, 2017, the Magistrate Judge in this matter submitted a report and recommendation (Doc. 18) recommending that the Court Reverse the Commissioner’s decision in this matter and remand for further proceedings pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §405(g). Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) provides that the parties may object to a report and recommendation within fourteen (14) days after service. No objections have been filed in this matter. Any further review by this Court would be a duplicative and inefficient use of the Court’s limited resources. Thomas v. Arn, 728 F.2d 813 (6th Cir. 1984); Howard v. Sec’y of Health and Human Servs., 932 F.2d 505 (6th Cir. 1991); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947, 949-50 (6th Cir. 1981). Accordingly, the report and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is hereby adopted. The decision of the Commissioner is hereby REVERSED, and the matter is REMANDED for further proceedings. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: October 18, 2017 /s/ John R. Adams_______________ JOHN R. ADAMS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
